
Teachers or Computers? Why not both!
So, do we still need teachers? Absolutely! Our latest research compared the effectiveness of various methods for delivering cognitive grammar training to young adults. What we discovered is that social interaction is key to robust language development. However, unlike rote learning, the improvement gained through the cognitive approach may take longer to manifest, but it is here to stay! Now, if you’re looking for a speedier yet sustainable boost, the quick answer is = teacher + computer. The analysis showed that the treatment group that received face-to-face cognitive grammar instruction followed by computer-assisted practice, learnt more quickly than those who exclusively learnt from a teacher. What about those that only learnt on computers? We found immediate and substantial gains in comprehension tasks (e.g., sentence processing), but the drop was proportionally large as well. Learners who only interacted with the computer might tend to prioritize the outcome (correct or wrong), rather than the feedback provided. Therefore, teachers play a significant role in highlighting how meaning, such as humor, can be crafted through wise linguistic choices rather than merely completing a drilling exercise at hand.